🔗 Share this article

Ken Burns is now considered more than a historical storyteller; he is a brand, a prolific creative force. When he has project heading for the television, all desire his attention.

Burns has done “an astonishing number of podcasts”, he says, nearing the end of his marathon promotional journey that included 40 cities, 80 screenings plus countless media sessions. “I think there are 340.1m podcasts, one for every American, and I’ve done half of them.”

Thankfully the filmmaker is incredibly dynamic, as loquacious behind the mic as he is prolific during post-production. The veteran director has traveled from prestigious venues to The Joe Rogan Experience to talk about one of his most ambitious projects: The American Revolution, a monumental six-part, 12-hour documentary series that occupied the past decade of his life and debuted recently on public television.

Timeless Filmmaking Method

Comparable to methodical preparation in today’s rapid-consumption era, this documentary series is defiantly traditional, more redolent of historical documentary classics as opposed to modern digital documentaries audio documentaries.

But for Burns, whose entire filmography exploring national heritage spanning various American subjects, its origin story is not just another subject but fundamental. “I said this to my co-director Sarah Botstein during our discussions, and she shared this view: no future work will carry greater importance,” Burns contemplates during a telephone interview.

Massive Research Effort

Burns, co-directors Botstein and David Schmidt plus scripting partner Geoffrey Ward utilized countless written sources and other historical materials. Dozens of historians, representing diverse viewpoints, provided on-air commentary along with leading scholars representing multiple disciplines like African American history, indigenous peoples’ narratives and the British empire.

Distinctive Filmmaking Approach

The style of the series will feel familiar to fans of historical documentaries. The unique approach included methodical photographic exploration over historical images, generous use of period music with performers voicing historical documents.

This period represented Burns built his legacy; years later, currently the elder statesman of documentary filmmaking, he seems able to recruit any actor he chooses. Participating with Burns at a recent event, acclaimed writer Lin-Manuel Miranda commented: “A call from Ken Burns commands immediate acceptance.”

Remarkable Ensemble

The extended filming period provided advantages in terms of flexibility. Sessions happened in studios, in relevant places through digital platforms, a tool embraced throughout the health crisis. The director describes collaborating with actor Josh Brolin, who found a few free hours in Atlanta to voice his character as the revolutionary leader prior to departing to other professional obligations.

Brolin is joined by multiple distinguished artists, respected performing veterans, diverse creative professionals, household names and rising talent, celebrated film and stage performers, British and American talent, Edward Norton, David Oyelowo, Mandy Patinkin, television and film stars, Dan Stevens, Meryl Streep.

Burns adds: “Frankly, this may be the best single cast gathered for any production. Their work is exceptional. Selection wasn’t based on fame. It irritated me when questioned, regarding the famous participants. I responded, ‘These are performers.’ They are among the world’s best performers and they vitalize these narratives.”

Nuanced Narrative

However, the lack of surviving participants, modern media forced Burns and his team to lean heavily on the written word, combining personal accounts of nearly 200 individual historic figures. This methodology permitted to show spectators not only to the “bold-faced names” of the revolution but also to “dozens of others essential to the narrative, many of whom lack visual representation.

Burns additionally pursued his individual interest for territorial understanding. “Maps fascinate me,” he observes, “with greater cartographic content throughout this series versus earlier productions I’ve done combined.”

Worldwide Consequences

The production crew recorded across multiple important places in various American regions and British sites to document environmental context and partnered extensively with re-enactors. All these elements combine to depict events more bloody, multifaceted and world-changing compared to standard education.

The documentary argues, represented more than local dispute concerning territory, taxes and political voice. Conversely, the project presents a brutal conflict that finally engaged numerous countries and unexpectedly manifested termed “mankind’s greatest hopes”.

Civil War Reality

Early dissatisfaction and objections leveled at London by far-flung British subjects across thirteen rebellious territories rapidly became a vicious internal war, setting brother against brother and neighbour against neighbour. During the second installment, the historian Alan Taylor observes: “The greatest misconception concerning independence struggle involves believing it represented that unified Americans. This omits the fact that Americans fought each other.”

Sophisticated Interpretation

For him, the independence account that “generally suffers from excessive romance and nostalgia and remains shallow and fails to properly acknowledge actual events, every individual involved and the incredible violence of it.

Taylor maintains, an uprising that declared the transformative concept of fundamental personal liberties; a brutal civil war, dividing revolutionaries and royalists; and a global war, the fourth in a series of wars between imperial nations for control of the continent.

Contingent Historical Events

The filmmaker also sought {to rediscover the