🔗 Share this article

As a DM, I traditionally steered clear of extensive use of randomization during my tabletop roleplaying adventures. My preference was for the plot and session development to be guided by character actions as opposed to the roll of a die. That said, I chose to try something different, and I'm truly pleased with the outcome.

The Inspiration: Watching an Improvised Tool

An influential actual-play show showcases a DM who often asks for "fate rolls" from the adventurers. The process entails choosing a type of die and outlining possible results based on the number. While it's at its core no distinct from rolling on a random table, these get invented spontaneously when a player's action doesn't have a clear resolution.

I chose to experiment with this approach at my own session, primarily because it seemed novel and offered a departure from my normal practice. The results were remarkable, prompting me to reconsider the ongoing tension between pre-determination and improvisation in a D&D campaign.

An Emotional Session Moment

During one session, my party had just emerged from a large-scale conflict. Later, a player wondered if two key NPCs—a sibling duo—had made it. Instead of choosing an outcome, I asked for a roll. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The possible results were: a low roll, both were killed; on a 5-9, a single one succumbed; on a 10+, they made it.

Fate decreed a 4. This triggered a profoundly emotional sequence where the characters found the corpses of their allies, still united in death. The cleric held last rites, which was particularly powerful due to previous roleplaying. As a final reward, I improvised that the remains were miraculously restored, containing a enchanted item. I rolled for, the bead's magical effect was perfectly what the group lacked to address another pressing quest obstacle. It's impossible to orchestrate these kinds of magical coincidences.

Improving On-the-Spot Skills

This experience caused me to question if randomization and thinking on your feet are actually the core of D&D. Even if you are a prep-heavy DM, your ability to adapt may atrophy. Players frequently excel at ignoring the most carefully laid narratives. Therefore, a effective DM must be able to adapt swiftly and invent content in real-time.

Using similar mechanics is a great way to develop these skills without going completely outside your usual style. The key is to use them for minor situations that won't drastically alter the overarching story. As an example, I would not employ it to establish if the main villain is a secret enemy. However, I might use it to determine whether the party arrive moments before a major incident unfolds.

Enhancing Collaborative Storytelling

Spontaneous randomization also works to maintain tension and cultivate the impression that the adventure is alive, evolving based on their decisions immediately. It prevents the feeling that they are merely characters in a DM's sole narrative, thereby strengthening the collaborative nature of storytelling.

Randomization has long been part of the game's DNA. The game's roots were reliant on encounter generators, which fit a playstyle focused on exploration. Although contemporary D&D frequently prioritizes plot-driven play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, it's not necessarily the only path.

Striking the Right Balance

Absolutely no problem with being prepared. But, there is also nothing wrong with letting go and allowing the rolls to decide some things in place of you. Control is a major part of a DM's role. We require it to facilitate play, yet we often struggle to release it, even when doing so might improve the game.

A piece of advice is this: Have no fear of letting go of control. Embrace a little randomness for smaller details. You might just discover that the organic story beat is far more powerful than anything you would have planned by yourself.